[IMPORTANT] This document is a template and requires further customization to meet your specific needs. Fill in the placeholders (e.g., [Project Name], [Link to coding style guide], [Your Name]) and adapt the content to your project’s requirements.

Code Review Workflow Pattern

1. Overview

This document outlines the code review workflow for the [Project Name] project. The purpose of this workflow is to ensure code quality, maintainability, and consistency across the codebase. All code must be reviewed and approved before being merged into the main branch.

2. Roles and Responsibilities

• Author: The developer who writes the code and creates the pull request.
• Reviewer: One or more developers who review the code, provide feedback, and approve the pull request.

3. Workflow

3.1. Before Submitting for Review

The author must ensure the following before submitting a pull request:

• The code is self-reviewed and tested.
• The code adheres to the project’s coding style guide ([Link to coding style guide]).
• The code is well-documented with comments where necessary.
• The pull request has a clear and descriptive title and description.
• The pull request is linked to the relevant issue or ticket.

3.2. Submitting for Review

The author creates a pull request in the project’s version control system (e.g., GitHub, GitLab).

3.3. During the Review

• Reviewers are expected to provide timely and constructive feedback.
• Reviewers should focus on the following aspects:
  • Correctness: Does the code do what it’s supposed to do?
  • Readability: Is the code easy to understand?
  • Maintainability: Is the code easy to modify and extend?
  • Performance: Does the code have any performance issues?
  • Security: Does the code have any security vulnerabilities?
• The author is expected to respond to feedback and make the necessary changes.

3.4. After the Review

• Once the pull request is approved by at least one reviewer, it can be merged into the main branch.
• The author is responsible for merging the pull request and deleting the feature branch.

4. Best Practices

• Keep pull requests small and focused.
• Be respectful and professional in all communication.
• Don’t be afraid to ask for clarification or help.
• Celebrate good work!

5. Document Information

• Author: [Your Name]
• Date: [Date]
• Version: 1.0

6. When to Use

This pattern is applicable in distributed systems and platform architectures where the described problem is encountered.

7. Anti-Patterns & Gotchas

Common mistakes include applying this pattern without understanding the specific context and constraints of the system.

8. References

See sources in frontmatter.